Wednesday, April 22, 2020
Oedipus Rex And Bliss Is Ignorance Essays - Oedipus The King, Operas
  Oedipus Rex And Bliss Is Ignorance    One of the most memorable and meaningful Socratic quotes applies well when in  context of Sophocles' Theban Trilogy. "The unexamined life is not worth  living," proclaims Socrates. He could have meant many things by this  statement, and in relation to the play, the meaning is found to be even more  complex. Indeed, the situation of Oedipus, king of Thebes, the truth of this  statement is in question. Would Oedipus have been better off if he was blind to  the knowledge of his birthing and the fate which was foretold to someday befall  him? Truly though, his life would have been a far better and easier path had he  never known about his true origins. His life in Corinth would have been long and  prosperous, and Thebes would have lived on under King Laius. In fact, everyone  would have been better off in the long run if Oedipus had not ventured out  beyond the walls of Corinth. So is it worth living an examined life? Socrates  had made this statement long after the creation of the Theban Trilogy. In the  context of his own time, this was meant to imply that life must be examined and  reflected upon, known and discovered by each individual philosopher to better  enrich life for all. Yet in terms of Sophoclean drama, specifically Oedipus Rex,  this was meant in a vastly different way. The unexamined life was one that was  in the dark, unknown as to what fate lied beyond every turn and irony of living.    Oedipus, up to the point in which he heard the comment in the tavern in Corinth,  lived an unexamined life. To Socrates, he was an unfulfilled man, one who  deserved to know more, one who not complete. However, in a much less  metaphysical sense, Oedipus' life was complete, in that he had all that he  needed, and was living a happy and fruitful life. As the drama progresses, he  finds out more and more, learning exactly what the implications of his birth  was, he suffers the fate for examining his life. So what Socrates had meant,  that the life which was not rich with self exploration and reflection was not  worth living, was indeed different than its application in terms of Oedipus,  who's life was unexamined, yet complete. The question arises, what would life  have been like, if Oedipus had not discovered his true origins? If he had stayed  in Corinth, would this have ever happened? We find that indeed, we would have  had no story, if not for that lone comment of a drunkard which sparked the fire  of rebellion in the young prince Oedipus. He ventured out to Delphi, to pry  knowledge of his background out of it, and to discover if this was indeed the  truth, despite the fact that his adopted parents of Corinth had assured him of  it falseness. Oedipus leaves Corinth, fulfilling the Socratic idea of the  unexamined life. However, we must evaluate the eventual consequences of his  actions and the implications which they possess. What becomes of his fateful  journey out of Corinth leads to the downfall of an entire city and family line.    If he had not murdered King Laius, the Sphinx would have never descended upon    Thebes, he would have never fulfilled the prophecy, and all would have lived on  in a relative peace and tranquillity. Once examining these aspects of the  relationship between the quote and Oedipus Rex, we can come to a final  examination of its implications. The question which was addressed, that of the  value of the examined life, can be answered. Indeed, if Oedipus had not ventured  beyond the protective walls of his adopted home, would anything such as what  occurred in the play ever have transpired? If Oedipus had not pursued that  answers to the mysteries that plagued him, despite the pleading warnings of I?casta,  in fact his life would have been contented and happy. Instead, he follows the    Socratic method of exploration and discovery, and proceeds down the path of pain  and distraught. Was, after it was over, all worth it? We find that no, it was  not. Being content and suited with what he knew of himself would have saved    Oedipus and his children/siblings much agony. However, in the typical Greek  tragedy, we must see his fall from grace through, which is indeed what happens.    In the bliss of ignorance, much pain and difficulty is averted. For what worries  does the ignorant man have? In the case of Oedipus, ignorance would have suited  him fine.    
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
 
